Invalid coordinate system type - only new SCARA.Ĭoordinate System Definition Data Number Specification Error Please secure an empty step necessary for preservation More excessive data than the outside is receivedĪn empty step to preserve the step data is insufficient. SCARA ABS Reset Special Movement Operation Type Error The specification of the number of coordinate system definition data is invalid. SCARA ABS reset special movement operation type is invalid - only new SCARA. Interference Check Zone Specification Invalid Error The positioning operation type is invalid - only new SCARA. SCIF Overrun Status (The IAI protocol is received) When the interference check zone invades, the error type is invalid. Interference Check Zone Data Number Specification Error Loss of communication possibly due to loss of power. Interference Check Zone Invasion Detection (message level specification) The specification of the number of interference check zone data is invalid. Rotary Axis CP Jog Prohibition Error Outside Range of Motion (Tool XY offset, exist, and.) (message level specification)- only new SCARA The interference check zone invasion was detected. (voltage level in which data can be backed up) Please move in range of motion with each axis Jog. The voltage of the system memory backup battery is low. Please exchange the battery (voltage level at which data cannot be backed up). The voltage of the absolute encoder data battery is low. Please check for battery connection or exchange.
#Insidia wow update#
System Mode Error During Core Section Update Chattering contact in the brake connection can also be a culprit. When the system mode was not a core part update mode, the update command was received. Please confirm the presence of the chip resistance for the core part update mode on substrate setting when you update the core part. It's unfortunate that something as basic as a saronite bomb, something that should be standard play for any leather working min/maxer was overlooked on the PTR. This is pretty unacceptable, I am no Ensidia fanboy living in the US. However I love the thrill of chasing world firsts, and whoever can take them has earned my respect for that tier of content. I'm usually pretty steely eyed when it comes to people abusing bugs to overcome a fight, however I am kind of on the fence on this one. Removing saronite bombs from your rotation would have been a gimp to the dps, it's kind of a weird no mans land of exploitation in my eyes. If they didn't know about the bug, then I am greatly disappointed in Blizzard. However, something tells me that they realized there was something odd going on. Thing is though, when you are fighting the greatest foe of Warcraft, the antangonist of Warcraft 3/World of Warcraft, I am 1000% sure that NO ONE is going to cancel their raid and send a ticket to a GM and wait for them to respond. What if we would cancel the raid and another guild claims the world first and doesn't get banned for it?" They were thinking the same thing as everyone would be thinking: " Mhh, chances are that we might get banned for this exploit, but we'd rather take the risk of claiming the world first, because it isn't even certain that we will get banned for this. I am sure they care more about the Heroic mode, but the normal mode is still an achievement on its own. Many people will probably be laughing at Ensidia, but to be honest I think everyone would have done the same. That American fail guild got banned as well, so I think it's only fair Ensidia got banned as well.
I do agree though that Blizzard should've fixed this bug before launching the last section of Icecrown Citadel. While this may seem as an obvious bug, I can imagine that it is not always clear for everyone. On one hand, their kill was bugged, so part of me says they should have to do it again. On the other hand, this isn't like Exodus's Yogg+0. What're they supposed to do? "Sorry rogues, but you'll just have to purposely do less dps because you're profession bonus breaks the game." They didn't go out of their way to evade bug mobs, all they did was go about their normal rotation, and it just so happened that a min-axing rogues rotation fucked up the encounter. What they should've done was stripped them of their items/achievement, but also refunded them their bugged attempts so they could do it the normal way instead of banning them.ĮDIT: However, that blog post by Muqq comes off to me as nothing more than very long, very whiny and immature QQ.I entirely agree with everything said here.
0 kommentar(er)
